Original text, László Harcz: What is the significance of the fact in humanity's survival by Darwin's "random mutation" overthrown is?

The following article, based on the potential of the latest developments in human evolutionary research, outlines the possibility of escaping humanity and the whole of living nature, and hence the possibility of recovery from the now emerging extinction threat ... 

What is the significance of the fact in humanity's survival by Darwin's "random mutation" overthrown is?

This means "only" that humankind can escape despite the fatal effects that the climate catastrophe (overheating), the release of methane from frozen soil and the magnetic pole change of the Earth mean individually; because in contrast to the very slow "random mutation formation" of Darwin, it is believed, and even proved by research, that evolution occurs very rapidly in the case of directed mutation formation.

This is good because there is very little time for mankind to prepare and defend against the environmental disaster. So, if evolution really works so fast, there can be so much change in global human consciousness, and therefore in our instincts, that it is now possible to achieve the much higher moral standard needed to make the sacrifices needed for environmental disasters bring.

From an environmental point of view, in order to avoid climate overheating, we should immediately stop polluting the environment, the fastest air pollution, those the emission of greenhouse gases. However, this would require a real moral renewal, a "big jump".

If this were to succeed, the release of methane would certainly cease, as the release of frozen soil in the vast areas of Siberia and the Himalayas and elsewhere would cease and methane would remain in the frozen soil.

And on the basis of the soil samples of the last 50 thousand years, it is not at all certain that the magnetic pole change would take place, as this process started twice during that period, but stopped and returned to its original state! 

So there is a chance of escaping this kind of cataclysm, which is so dangerous for the whole of nature, because while the pole change takes place, the Earth's surface remains unprotected against cosmic radiation (because the cosmic radiation is neutralized by the Earth's magnetic field, and radiation does not reach the surface of the Earth), and without protection, this cosmic particle shower would destroy the entire living nature.

But how do these catastrophic phenomena come together with Darwin and on what I base my optimism?

Starting from the end: it is possible that natural selection according to research can be selected not only from random mutations but also from directed mutations; In our genetic material, mutations develop in a directed way, presumably always towards the properties that can be most effectively defended against the external, harmful effects of the ancestor's life and to maintain the survival of the offspring, and to make their survival more secure.

The significance of this is from our point of view that while Darwin's "random mutation and selection" is an incredibly slow process, selection by directional mutations in today's views, and thus the entire evolutionary process, works many times faster than the Darwinian process.

The faster evolution allows, in the case of sufficient consciousness change and moral willingness, based on Maria Kopp cognitive-psychologist's idea that "the understood instinctive actions can be influenced by consciousness", morality can thus increase to a sufficient extent based on conscious insight!

The theory of directed mutations was written by the author of these lines about 15 years ago in some forums on the Internet. At the time when this idea was basically confirmed by epigeneticist Bruce Lipton with his famous cell culture experiments ...

Today already prof. Tamás Bereczkei, head of the Evolutionary Psychology Research Group at the University of Pécs, also talks about the direct relationship between the instinct genes and the so-called cultural evolution, so many professors with unquestionable professional prestige confirmed that my conjecture was good.

It is becoming more and more evident that human evolution works so that not only environmental (ie outside world) changes shape our genetic material, but also our perceptions within our inner minds, our emotions (like Bruce Lipton's epigenetic famous cellular experiment of about 15 years ago this was already probable!), and from the emotional point of view, the thinking part of mankind, that is, our emotional interests, our value system almost requires us to make the necessary sacrifices for disaster relief!

I think our feelings are the impulzes from the interaction between our instincts and our minds. In the case of sufficiently deep and sufficiently intensive common thinking on the subject, the determination and sacrifice of mankind, and thus its moral quality, can reach the level at which we do all the necessary self-restraining measures, make the necessary sacrifices, and a large part of mankind will escape the current disaster wave!

So, if the most favorable scenario is realized and humanity pays due attention to the threatening cataclysms, it recognizes that if we do not act, if we do not sacrifice, if we do not stop the pollution immediately, if we do not show enough decency and altruism (sacrifice), if not all possible public plenary sessions, media channels and net online forums are meaningful situation exploration, responsible discussion, and no responsible and in-depth restrictive measures are taken - then we are over!

So the disaster scenario:

- above all, the stupidity, lack of interest, indifference, individual selfishness, the low social level of morality and ignorance win;

- plastic pollution continues, a considerable part of the fish between the torments dies because the stomach is filled with plastic waste;

- the strong destruction of coral colonies, the already increased sea-temperature rise; 

- the mass destruction of marine fish and other species living on them due to the loss of their habitat and the warming of seawater;

- the rising temperatures release huge amounts of methane from the frozen so-called permafrost soils in Siberia and the vast Himalayas, Greenland, etc., while we know that the same amount of methane gas causes 30 times more greenhouse effect than carbon dioxide!

- meanwhile, there is a magnetic reversal of the Earth, which leads to mutations in genes caused by cosmic mass radiation, even if the more favorable, happy version is realized and the polar reversal that has already begun is not completed, but returns to the "original" state …

End then I only touched on the major causes of disasters!

So, in summary, the physiological adaptation of what is now called "cultural evolution" that works against the very slow Darwinian system is not by accidental mutations (which is extremely slow), but by the development of targeted mutations very quickly!

This works much faster than the process that Darwin presupposed.

This would allow all mankind to receive tremendous emotional support from our instincts and the depths of our minds, to finally be able to make the necessary sacrifices, to introduce the necessary self-restraint, and if it is accompanied by a little luck with pole reversal, humanity can be saved.

Harcz László